Community resourceWorksheet
OCR H446 1.5.2 Environmental lifecycle of computing
Part 3 of 9 · H446 1.5.2 · Moral and ethical issues
Environmental questions in OCR H446 1.5.2 are too often answered with electricity use alone. This worksheet extends the analysis across extraction, manufacture, transport, use, repair and disposal, then puts students inside a replace-or-extend decision about school hardware.
Students will:
- describe the environmental effects that arise at each stage of a device lifecycle
- distinguish impacts created during manufacture from those created while a device is in use
- weigh remaining life and repairability against the efficiency of a replacement
- suggest design changes that reduce the impact of a streaming service without assuming it stops
- state the evidence that should decide a hardware replacement recommendation
Inside: 5 explanation cells, 1 multiple-choice question, 2 fill-in-the-blanks cells and 2 written answers. 26 marks, about 20 to 40 minutes.
Series: H446 1.5.2 · Moral and ethical issues, part 3 of 9.
Shared by Coding PathwayVerified teacher
- 10 cells
- About 30 minutes
- CC BY-SA 4.0
- Shared 31 Aug 2026
- Updated 3 Sept 2026
Preview
The whole resource, exactly as a class sees it. Answers and marking are held back.
Environmental lifecycle of computing
This worksheet examines environmental effects across the full lifecycle of computing equipment. When a question asks about environmental effects, a complete answer considers more than the electricity used while a device is switched on.
Four lifecycle stages
Extracting materials uses finite resources and can damage habitats. Manufacturing and transport use energy and water. Using equipment requires electricity, cooling, networks and data centres. Disposal can create toxic electronic waste, while repair, reuse and recycling can keep devices or materials in use.
Computing can also reduce some environmental effects, for example through efficient route planning or remote access. Do not assume a technology is greener: compare the relevant evidence across its lifecycle.
Worked comparison: replace or keep using
New school laptops may use less electricity and be more reliable. However, making them uses materials and energy, while throwing away repairable machines creates electronic waste.
A supported recommendation would compare the old and new machines’ measured energy use, remaining useful life, repair needs, reuse or recycling routes, and the source of the electricity. One stage alone is not enough.
Which method gives the fairest environmental comparison between keeping old devices and buying replacements?
- ACompare purchase price and energy use, but assume manufacturing has the same effect for both options
- BCompare manufacturing and disposal, but leave out how long each option will be used
- CCompare manufacturing, expected energy use, useful life, repair or reuse, and disposal for both options
- DCompare electricity use during one lesson and treat the lower figure as the complete answer
- extraction
- operating
- recycling
- stages
- password
A video platform automatically starts videos in high resolution. Explain two environmental effects of this design. For each effect, explain one change that could reduce it without stopping people from streaming.
Connect the design to data transfer, processing, storage or device energy use. State one possible disadvantage of each change.
Students type their answer here.
Apply the ideas independently
The next task asks you to compare a new pair of options. Use the same lifecycle stages and types of evidence for both.
A school can keep repairable desktops for four more years or replace them with lower-energy mini computers. Discuss the environmental implications of the two options.
Compare like with like, identify uncertainty and explain what evidence should guide a supported conclusion.
Students type their answer here.
Review your responses
Check that each environmental claim names a lifecycle stage and explains an effect. Replace any unsupported ‘always’ claim with a comparison based on evidence.